Experts Present New Evidence Supporting 9/11 Controlled Demolition Theory
June 3, 2025
So many people still don’t realise or are willing to believe that 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, undertaken by American operatives to justify a US invasion of Iraq to control Iraq’s oil and gain a massive stronghold across the Middle East. Conspiracy theory you might say?
Well the evidence continues to mount and not by people like me, but by everyday Americans, especially experts in archiecture, engineering and contruction who should and do know.
This interview featuring respected American architect Robert Gage, first broadcast in 2010 on Californian TV station KMPH, is being reshared again now as more evidence comes to light of the truth that refuses to be buried alongwith the 3000 plus souls that lost their lives on the 11th of September 2001.
I recommend you do a random search on Google if you want further proof of the biggest cover up of the 21st Century and worst betrayal of the American people by their own government.
Copy and paste this link in your search bar to watch the full interview with Robert Gage. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f_hPtS7Lu4
SHARE the TRUTH
@nyc_wtc @richardgage @nyc_wtc911truth
#wtc #911 #nyc #neverforget #worldtradecenter #september11th #twintowers
English Script:
Host 1: Richard Gage is here to show us why he’s calling for a more thorough investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings. Thank you so much for joining us.
Richard Gage: You’re very welcome. It’s great to be here.
Host 1:Well, first of all, give us a little bit more about your background.
Richard Gage: Well, I’m an architect of 20 years, member of the American Institute of Architects and have been studying steel frame, fireproof buildings for about that long.
Host 2:We asked that for clarification because as we get into this, we want people to make sure that you’re not just somebody with a wacky idea, okay? You hem with some science to you. What is the official reason for the collapse of the World Trade Center towers?
Richard Gage: Well, we’re told that the planes hit the buildings and there was an explosion and a fire. And about an hour and a half later, in the case of the North Tower, the buildings collapsed due to structural weakening due to the fires. The problem is that we don’t have large gradual deformations associated with the collapses and fires in high rises have never brought down a steel frame of high rise building at all, ever. And what we have, unfortunately, is the evidence in the Twin Towers and the third skyscraper to collapse that day, which most people don’t know anything about it. We have the evidence of the ten key features of controlled demolition. In the case of building seven, it collapses straight down into its own footprint at freefall speed in the first 100ft. It’s dropping, as you can see, symmetrically, smoothly at freefall speed in the first 100ft, 2.5 seconds. This is uncanny. There’s 40,000 tons of structural steel designed to resist this collapse.
Host 2:Is it what? A 47 story building?
Richard Gage: Yeah, it’s just called building seven, right? A football field away from the Twin Towers.
Host 2:Okay, so what we’re showing is, left, what happened, in fact. Right, is a controlled, where you are using or the people who made this happen used demolition.
Richard Gage: Indeed, and it’s a direct comparison. And you can see that indeed almost, freefall speed, freefall acceleration through 40,000 tons of structural steel. That is uncanny. So we have 700 architects and engineers demanding a new investigation as a result of this evidence. And the evidence in the World Trade Center. That is very explosive. Almost every architect, and engineer we show this information to, agrees with us that these are controlled demolitions. If we can get them to look at the information, because obviously, the implications of a controlled demolition are dark for our country, because that means somebody besides Al-Qaeda was involved, because these have to be easily three of the most highly secure buildings outside the Pentagon.