New Epstein Documents Reference 9/11 “False Flag” Claim
February 22, 2026
REPOST
.
.
.
.
More than two decades after the September 11 attacks, the vast majority of people continue to argue that the tragedy was a “false flag” operation, a term used to describe an attack carried out by one party but blamed on another.
Those advancing the debate often point to issues such as intelligence warnings prior to the attacks, the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, and the discovery of hijackers passports in the aftermath. Others question how the attacks reshaped U.S. foreign policy, including the subsequent wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Many critics further argue that the broader outcome of 9/11 was to create division and fuel anti-Muslim sentiment in the United States and Europe. They claim the attacks were used to generate public support for military intervention in the Middle East, citing the launch of the War on Terror and the 2003 invasion of Iraq as examples. Within these circles, such outcomes are viewed as evidence that the attacks served a larger geopolitical agenda.
Debate continues in many corners of the internet, where trust in government institutions shapes ongoing discussion about the events of September 11.
(Posting solely for news, journalism, important issues and raising awareness purposes only)
@itsallmaad
#news #september11 #america #fyp #usa
English Script:
N/A
