Physicists Question 9/11 Collapse: 40,000 Tons of Steel Disappeared in Seconds — Was It Controlled Demolition?
October 12, 202540,000 TONS OF STEEL GONE IN SECONDS.
Physicists are now confirming what millions have long suspected BUILDINGS DON’T FALL AT FREE-FALL SPEED unless something made them.
No resistance. No logic. No physics.
Just a perfectly timed controlled demolition disguised as “terrorism.”
For years they called it a conspiracy.
Now, it’s science catching up to the lies.
#911Truth #InsideJob #ControlledDemolition #PhysicsDontLie #9_11WasAnInsideJob #ExposeTheLies #FreeFallCollapse #Building7 #TruthMovement #QuestionEverything
English Script:
David Chandler: This building. It’s amazing. What we’re looking at is a building just coming straight down, falling right through itself with zero resistance. Buildings don’t have zero resistance. Which is why you feel comfortable walking into a building. This building had 40,000 tons of structural steel and it’s structural system. And that is intended to keep it from going anywhere. I’ve heard people say, well, it came down at free fall or close to free fall and so forth. So I decided to measure it myself. I had a simple tool at the time called Physics Toolkit, which allowed me to take a video and put a dot on each frame to follow the motion of things, and I realized that it’s actually coming down at free fall, pretty much dead on the acceleration of gravity. Well, NIST, in their final draft, was saying that the building came down 40% longer than freefall time.
Unknown man: How can such a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity be set aside?
Shyam Sunder: A freefall time would be an object that has no structural components below it. There was a structural resistance that was provided in this particular case.
David Chandler: He was making our case for us. You can’t have free fall when there is support. And the final report. They modified it and they actually admitted there was a period of freefall involved. But they never changed their model. Like, how do you all of a sudden allow for freefall when they just got done explaining how it couldn’t have been in freefall?
Unknown physicist 1: And it’s just telling us that the building below it ceased to exist. For the first few seconds of the collapse of the building, well, things in physics just don’t cease to exist. And cease to resist the forces that are on them. The building didn’t disappear. So the building can fall for 100ft at freefall speed. That’s impossible. That’s a violation of the fundamental law of physics that says that for every action, there’s an equal and opposite reaction.
Unknown physicist 2: The floors fall, they tend to fall, and are braced by the floor directly beneath it. And there’s some delay there.
Ronald Brookman: Because of redundancy, because of all the other columns in the building that were not affected.
Casey Pfeiffer: Even if a floor were to collapse, it still wouldn’t be able to collapse all of the connections simultaneously at the rate that it did without secondary explosions.
