Science, Not Silence: What HIV Research Reveals About COVID — Overlapping Methods, Protein Structures and Immune Risks Examined
January 2, 2026
What can decades of HIV research teach us about COVID?
In this discussion, Dr. Peter A. McCullough examines overlapping research methods, protein structures, and immune-response questions and argues that rigorous debate and transparent data are essential to public trust.
You don’t have to agree to listen.
But shutting down scientific questions helps no one.
@drjoshaxe
#covidvaccine #hivresearch #MedicalDebate #freepalestine #fyp
English Script:
Dr. Peter A. McCulloug: There’s multiple papers showing some people who get Covid actually turned HIV positive. It wasn’t that common, but that segment of the spike protein must have been exposed to the immune system. Then the Australians broke this open and they did a randomized trial of a Covid vaccine, exposing that part of the spike protein to subjects in Australia. They all turned HIV positive. All of them. So you could type it in. Australian vaccine trial turns every subject HIV positive. There it is. So there is something about the spike protein that was very unnatural. Like why is it identical to a segment of HIV? Then all the information comes out of Wuhan, China. And the House subcommittee investigations on this, the spike protein was engineered. It’s not a natural protein. It’s engineered. Doctor Ralph Baric at University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak at the EcoHealth Alliance, Xingling Li at Wuhan. They collaborated and they made an indestructible spike protein.
Interviewer: Doctor Fauci, correct me if I’m wrong in the 1980s, he was very involved with research around HIV.
Dr. Peter A. McCulloug: Yeah.
